B&T USA Issues Official Statement Following Dispute With B&T AG

Following reports that B&T AG terminated its licensing agreement with B&T USA over alleged unpaid fees, B&T USA has issued an official response addressing customers, dealers, and partners.

In our previous coverage, “B&T AG Ends Licensing Agreement With B&T USA Over Unpaid Fees”,  in that article I outlined the claims made by the Swiss firearm manufacturer. This latest statement from B&T USA provides additional context from the U.S. side, focusing on operations, trademarks, and continuity of service.

B&T USA Remains Operational

According to the company’s two-page response, B&T USA remains fully operational and continues to manufacture, assemble, and support B&T products for the U.S. market.

Its Herriman, Utah facility is currently active, producing firearms and proprietary suppressor systems. The company also noted recent investments in manufacturing infrastructure, including a new high-capacity laser printing equipment, with additional systems expected to arrive soon.

Production activities in Tampa are ongoing, with plans to consolidate operations into the Herriman facility in the coming months. B&T USA states that firearm assembly utilizing both U.S.- and Swiss-sourced components continues without interruption.

The company also confirmed that it will continue fulfilling its obligations under the U.S. military’s Sub Compact Weapon program, with no expected disruptions.

Trademark Dispute Takes Center Stage

A key point of contention lies in the ownership of U.S.-based trademarks.

While B&T AG has requested the return of trademarks as part of the licensing termination, B&T USA has firmly rejected that demand.

In its statement, the company asserts:

B&T USA is the registered owner of the B&T trademark in the United States, as reflected in the records of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We intend to defend our trademark rights vigorously. B&T USA further maintains that it is the only entity authorized to sell products under the B&T brand within the United States, and that it is actively enforcing that position.

A Fractured Relationship

B&T USA acknowledged that it had hoped to resolve the dispute privately and maintain its relationship with its Swiss counterpart. However, those efforts were unsuccessful, and the situation escalated.

Despite the split, the company emphasized that it intends to handle the matter privately moving forward, avoiding public disputes while focusing on business continuity.

At the same time, B&T USA says it is actively working to stabilize and reinforce its supply chain, ensuring there are no gaps in production, assembly, or long-term product support.

What This Means for Dealers and Costumers

Dealers

B&T USA states that dealer relationships remain unchanged. Existing orders, pricing, and terms will continue as normal, and dealers are encouraged to contact their representatives with any questions.

Customers

Customers can expect continued warranty coverage, parts availability, and technical support for B&T products. The company emphasized that all firearms and suppressors sold through B&T USA will remain fully supported.

Additionally, B&T USA is advising both dealers and consumers to verify any third-party claims of authorized distribution, urging direct communication with the company to confirm legitimacy.

Moving Forward

As B&T USA moves ahead, the company seeks to position itself as an independent force within the U.S. market, committed to maintaining its reputation on quality and innovation.

Its stated focus remains unchanged: designing and manufacturing high-performance firearms and suppressors while continuing to support both civilian and military customers. Central to that vision is a renewed emphasis on domestic production what the company describes as delivering “Swiss precision, U.S.-made.”

Conclusion

The split between B&T AG and B&T USA marks a significant moment for the brand’s presence in the American market. While the legal and business implications are still unfolding, B&T USA’s message is clear: operations continue, support remains intact, and the company intends to stand its ground.

For dealers and consumers, the immediate impact appears minimal but the long-term outcome will depend on how this dispute over licensing, trademarks, and control of the brand ultimately resolves.